ZUCKERT v. ZUCKERT


13 Misc.2d 893 (1957)

Esther T. Zuckert, Plaintiff, v. Mortimer Zuckert et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.

January 7, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rothenberg, Atkins & Koss for plaintiff.

Mordecai Dancis for defendants.


HOWARD T. HOGAN, J.

Defendants move to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendant Zuckert were married in 1929, that both are residents of New York State, that on March 7, 1956, said defendant procured a decree of divorce in Mexico purporting to dissolve their marriage, and on that name...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases