1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 99 S.E.2d
  5. 99 S.E.2d 767 (1957)
 

BURLESON v. FRANCIS

No. 92.

99 S.E.2d 767 (1957)

246 N.C. 619

Earl BURLESON v. Charles C. FRANCIS, Sam Ferguson and Thomas H. Rogers, Buncombe County Review Committee.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 18, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Howell, and McLean, Gudger, Elmore & Martin, Asheville, for plaintiff appellant.

J. Stephen Doyle, Jr. and Neil Brooks, Washington, D. C., J. M. Baley, Jr., Asheville, Robert H. Lacey, Raleigh, N. C., Emily A. Kindel, Washington, D. C., for defendants appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Pertinent Section No. 1366 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act declares that "the review by the court shall be limited to questions of law, and the findings of fact by the Review Committee, if supported by evidence shall be conclusive."

In the light of this provision the finding of fact by Judge of Superior Court that the determination by the Review Committee is supported by substantial evidence is binding on this Court if there be evidence to support...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases