HAGE ET UX v. HARVEY ET AL


210 Or. 652 (1957)

313 P.2d 448

HAGE ET UX v. HARVEY ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed July 3, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.C. Winslow, Salem, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants.

George A. Rhoten, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Lawrence A. Harvey. On the brief was Sam F. Speerstra, Salem.

No appearance for respondent Salem Title Company.

Before LUSK, Presiding Justice, WARNER and KESTER, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

WARNER, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract made between the plaintiff-appellants and defendant-respondent Harvey. From an adverse decree the plaintiffs appeal.

The defendant Salem Title Company by a cross-complaint interpleaded and tendered into court the $10,000 later referred to as a deposit in escrow and prayed for a decree respecting the ownership of the fund as between the plaintiffs and the defendant Harvey.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases