NEECE v. RICHMOND GREYHOUND LINES

No. 738.

99 S.E.2d 756 (1957)

246 N.C. 547

Marietta NEECE v. RICHMOND GREYHOUND LINES, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 18, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. C. Cates, Jr. and W. R. Dalton, Jr., Burlington, for plaintiff appellant.

Jordan & Wright and Perry C. Henson, Greensboro, for defendant appellee.


RODMAN, Justice.

The loss which plaintiff sustained results from a movement of goods in interstate commerce; hence, the rights of the parties must be determined by the application of appropriate Federal statutes. St. Sing v. Express Co., 183 N.C. 405, 111 S.E. 710; Scott v. Express Co., 189 N.C. 377, 127 S.E. 252; Crompton v. Baker, 220 N.C. 52, 16 S.E.2d 471.

Congress, by the Interstate Commerce Act (Part I, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-27) enacted in 1906...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases