1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 211 Or.
  5. 211 Or. 640 (1957)
 

CALLBECK ET AL v. KELL ET AL

211 Or. 640 (1957)

317 P.2d 589

CALLBECK ET AL v. KELL ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Appeal dismissed November 6, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas B. Brand, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were William M. Langley, District Attorney, and Willis A. West, Chief Deputy of Civil Department, Portland.

Glen McCarty, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was J.W. Rosacker, Portland.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, LUSK, WARNER and KESTER, Justices.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM.

1. This is a proceeding in mandamus. The petitioners-respondents, Ronald E. Callbeck, Edward E. Hurita and Fred W. Boynton, are civil service employees of the sheriff's office in Multnomah county. All hold the rank of sergeant in the uniform division of that office and are eligible for promotion to the rank of lieutenant in that division.

The defendants-appellants, Raymond Kell, William Way and John Schum, at the time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases