PER CURIAM.
The trial court held that the appellant could not collect under a theft provision of an insurance policy issued by the appellee on a car because he failed to show ownership of the car. The amount in controversy was under $2,500 but over $200. We are affirming the judgment because we think the finding of the trial court was correct.
The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
