MACKOWSKI v. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE MUT. INS. CO.


275 Wis. 545 (1957)

MACKOWSKI, Respondent, v. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 7, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by James L. McMonigal of Berlin.

For the respondent there was a brief by Milton Spoehr of Berlin, and Lehner & Lehner of Princeton, and oral argument by Mr. Spoehr and Mr. Philip Lehner.


WINGERT, J.

We find no error and therefore affirm the judgment for the plaintiff.

1. The jury's finding that Stollfus was negligent with respect to speed is abundantly supported in the record. Reference need only be made to the testimony of the witness Kemnitz as summarized in the foregoing statement of facts.

It is contended that Kemnitz's observation of Stollfus' speed was too remote from the time and place of the accident, and hence the testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases