TUCK v. TUCK


11 Misc.2d 809 (1957)

Irwin Tuck et al., Plaintiffs, v. Hattie G. Tuck et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

December 17, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raphael & Dorman for Hattie G. Tuck and another, defendants.

Joseph Benisch for plaintiffs.


MILES F. McDONALD, J.

In this action to impress a trust and for an accounting, defendants Tuck move to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that it fails to set forth strong and compelling reasons why the litigation should not be determined in the appropriate Surrogate's Court; and on the further ground that there is another action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases