The court makes the following findings of fact: "That in the delivery of money from decedent William Kassebohm to respondent Alfred J. Jennings it was not the intention of the parties that such delivery constituted a gift or transfer of title to Alfred J. Jennings, but it was intended by them that Alfred J. Jennings was the depository of such money for the convenience of William Kassebohm and that the deposit was to be subject to his order and direction". The order to be...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.