1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 274 Wis.
  5. 274 Wis. 533 (1957)
 

FISH CREEK PARK CO. v. BAYSIDE

274 Wis. 533 (1957)

FISH CREEK PARK COMPANY, Appellant, vs. VILLAGE OF BAYSIDE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 7, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by H. O. Wolfe and Wolfe, O'Leary & Kenney of Milwaukee, and oral argument by H. O. Wolfe.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Suel O. Arnold of Milwaukee.

BROADFOOT, J.

Upon this appeal the plaintiff does not argue the merits of its first two objections. Apparently it is satisfied that the ruling of the trial court thereon was correct. Plaintiff states the question to be resolved here as follows:

"Does the annexation ordinance to all intents and purposes make the area in question an integral part of the village of Bayside so that it, like the balance of the village, would be considered as part of the Nineteenth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases