ASSOCIATED-BANNING COMPANY et al., Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES of America,
Federal Maritime Board, Respondents,
Matson Navigation Company, Encinal Terminals, Matson Terminals, Inc., Matcinal Corporation, Intervenors, Howard Terminal, Intervenor.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued February 4, 1957.
Decided June 21, 1957.
Petition for Rehearing Denied September 12, 1957.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Odell Kominers, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. J. Alton Boyer, Henry G. Fischer, Washington, D. C., and Allan P. Matthew, San Francisco, Cal., were on the brief, for petitioners, and intervenor, Howard Terminal.
Mr. Donald F. Melchior, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Mr. Daniel M. Friedman, Atty., Dept. of Justice, was on the brief, for respondent United States of America.
Mr. Charles H. Weston, Atty., Dept. of Justice, also entered an appearance for respondent United States of America.
Mr. Edward Aptaker, Chief, Regulation Branch, Federal Maritime Board, with whom Messrs. Edward D. Ransom, Gen. Counsel, Federal Maritime Board, and James L. Pimper, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Maritime Board, were on the brief, for respondent Federal Maritime Board.
Mr. Alvin J. Rockwell, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Messrs. Hugh T. Fullerton and Tom Killefer, San Francisco, Cal., were on the brief, for intervenors Matson Nav. Co., and others.
Mr. Noble McCartney also entered an appearance for intervenor Encinal Terminals.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners1 seek review of an order of the Federal Maritime Board approving Agreement No. 80632 which had been filed with the Board on January 9, 1956, pursuant to the requirements of § 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, 46 U.S.C.A. § 814 (1952).3 After notice of the filing of the Agreement had been published in the Federal Register, petitioners lodged...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
