CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

No. 13557.

247 F.2d 556 (1957)

The CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent, City of Lancaster, Ohio, Intervenor, Ohio Fuel Gas Company, Intervenor, Dayton Power and Light Company, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 20, 1957.

Petition for Rehearing Denied September 9, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Walter E. Beckjord, Cincinnati, Ohio, with whom Mr. Valentine B. Deale, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioner.

Mr. Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Power Comm., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Federal Power Comm., C. Louis Knight and David S. Lichtenstein, Attys., Federal Power Comm., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, submitted on the brief, for respondent.

Mr. Edward H. Laylin, Columbus, Ohio, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Ohio, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. John Peyton Randolph, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, submitted on the brief for intervenor, Ohio Fuel Gas Co.

Messrs. Julian de Bruyn Kops and Roy D. Boucher, Dayton, Ohio, were on the brief for intervenor, City of Lancaster, Ohio. Mr. Frederick C. Wellington, Dayton, Ohio, also entered an appearance for intervenor, City of Lancaster, Ohio.

Messrs. Julian de Bruyn Kops and Roy D. Boucher, Dayton, Ohio, were on the brief for intervenor, The Dayton Power and Light Co. Mr. Frederick C. Wellington, Dayton, Ohio, also entered an appearance for intervenor, The Dayton Power and Light Co.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company seeks review and modification of an order of the Federal Power Commission which permitted Ohio Fuel Gas Company, from which it purchases natural gas, to introduce into its demand-commodity rate structure a contract demand long-term billing commitment provision.

In Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Power Comm., 1957, 100 U.S. App.D.C. ___, 246 F.2d 688, this petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases