MITTELSTADT v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO.


2 Wis.2d 78 (1957)

MITTELSTADT, Appellant, vs. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 5, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Donald L. Farr of Eau Claire.

For the respondents Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Gerald F. Quigley there was a brief by Stafford, Pfiffner & Stafford of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by Robert F. Pfiffner.

For the respondents Hardware Mutual Casualty Company and Anton Long there was a brief by Wilcox & Sullivan of Eau Claire, and oral argument by Arthur B. Sullivan.


MARTIN, C. J.

It is our opinion that the verdict must be upheld in so far as it finds Quigley was not negligent. There is nothing in the record which would appear to cast doubt upon his veracity. The only logical inference to be drawn from the physical facts is that Esther Long invaded the north lane of the road, as Quigley testified. Respondent refers to Exhibit 12, a photograph of the Long car, claiming it shows damage on the left front, the inference being that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases