On the trial the court permitted plaintiff to amend his bill of particulars to allege a permanent injury to his right wrist in the nature of restriction or limitation of motion. It was within the trial court's discretion to permit such an amendment, and the record does not indicate an abuse of discretion. In answer to a hypothetical question a physician who had examined plaintiff, but had not treated him, was permitted to testify that the accident could have been a competent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
