HAMILTON, Chief Justice.
This was a suit filed by appellee against appellant on an alleged contract of employment, wherein the appellant had employed the appellee as a superintendent of the electrical part of his business, and for balance due on two trucks alleged to have been sold to appellant. Appellant answered with denial, and brought cross-action for $1,933.10. Upon the verdict of the jury, the court entered judgment for appellee in the sum of $5,823.34, consisting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
