1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 209 Or.
  5. 209 Or. 553 (1957)
 

BERNASKI v. LIUDAHL

209 Or. 553 (1957)

307 P.2d 510

BERNASKI v. LIUDAHL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 27, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Arthur Powers and Earle P. Skow, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Frank E. Day argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Stern, Reiter & Day and Roger G. Tilbury, Portland.

Before TOOZE, Acting Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY and McALLISTER, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by Oscar A. Liudahl, one of the two defendants, from an order of the circuit court which vacated a judgment, based upon a verdict, which had been entered in favor of both defendants and granted a new trial as to Liudahl. The challenged order was in response to a motion for a new trial made by the plaintiff, Pauline Bernaski. The action which terminated in the manner just mentioned was instituted by Mrs. Bernaski to recover...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases