The respondent determined by appropriate order that petitioner realized excessive profits during 1952 in the amount of $31,112. There is no issue about the amount of profits which the respondent determined to be excessive. The only issue is whether petitioner was an independent contractor, i. e., a subcontractor within the definition of a subcontract in section 103 (g) (3) of the Renegotiation Act of 1951, as the respondent has determined, or a full-time employee of a contracting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
