The defendant-appellant, through his attorney, contended that the testimony did not support the charge; that there was a serious question concerning identification of the defendant; that the testimony of one of the People's witnesses was subject to question as to relevancy; that there was no definite estimate of the speed of the car; and that there was reversible error in the examination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
