1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 230 S.C.
  5. 230 S.C. 491 (1957)
 

CAROLINA HOUSING & MTG. CORP. v. REYNOLDS

17255

230 S.C. 491 (1957)

96 S.E.2d 485

CAROLINA HOUSING & MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Respondent, v. ARTHUR CARLTON REYNOLDS and GLADYS REYNOLDS, Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

January 31, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Williams & Busbee, of Aiken, for Appellants.

Messrs. George H. Grant and Arthur D. Rich, of Aiken, for Respondent.

January 31, 1957.

STUKES, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented by the appellants in this case is whether the respondent is a holder in due course, without notice, of the negotiable promissory note in suit.

It was given in payment for repairs and improvements to appellants' residence and was payable in monthly installments over a period of thirty-six months, the first of which fell due in April 1953 and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases