1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 144 Conn.
  5. 144 Conn. 568 (1957)
 

BLOOMFIELD v. BLOOMFIELD

144 Conn. 568 (1957)

DOROTHY BLOOMFIELD v. ARNOLD BLOOMFIELD

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 29, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Weiner, with whom, on the brief, was Lester Aaronson, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Arnold Bloomfield, pro se, the appellee (defendant).

WYNNE, C. J., BALDWIN, DALY, KING and MURPHY, JS.

MURPHY, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to obtain a divorce on the ground of intolerable cruelty and has appealed from a judgment for the defendant. The finding, with such minor corrections as are warranted, supports the determination that the conduct of the defendant was cruel but not intolerable.

"Intolerable cruelty" as used in § 7327 of the General Statutes has a subjective as well as an objective meaning. There must be not only proof of acts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases