Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered.
The only witness who could testify as to the commission of the crime charged against appellant was the complaining witness, an eight-year-old child, who testified on the trial as to details of the alleged offense which were at variance with the facts alleged in the information. Appellant's attorney was, in our opinion, unduly restricted in his cross-examination of the arresting officer from inquiring...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
