PER CURIAM.
Appellant sued for the amount paid by him to appellee for the purchase of a taxicab, alleging that while the full purchase price had been paid, appellee refused to deliver the title to the car and that accordingly he was entitled to the return of the amount paid, as well as the daily rental he could have secured from the taxicab and which was lost to him because of the lack of title to the car. Appellee denied that the full purchase price had been paid...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
