1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 1 Wis.2d
  5. 1 Wis.2d 621 (1957)
 

REHSE v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

1 Wis.2d 621 (1957)

REHSE, Respondent, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 8, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.

For the respondent there was a brief by Swan & Strub of Beaver Dam, attorneys, and Wilkie, Anderson & Bylsma, Horace W. Wilkie, La Follette, Sinykin & Doyle, Gordon Sinykin, and Walter B. Raushenbush of counsel, all of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Horace W. Wilkie and Mr. Raushenbush.

MARTIN, C. J.

Early in 1952 the Conservation Commission, in its operation of the Horicon Marsh Wildlife Area, gave notice that trapping for muskrat in the Area would be authorized for the period from March 15, 1952, to April 15, 1952, "for the primary purpose of reducing the muskrat population on open-water areas, in order that we may enhance emergent plant growth."

Elmer Rehse, who resided on a farm in the vicinity of the marsh and engaged in trapping, received...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases