CAYTON, Acting Judge.
A jury convicted James H. Alexander of assault, and he appeals.
The first claim of error is that the trial judge improperly limited the scope of cross-examination of a police officer. The approved statement of evidence recites that "after extensive questioning" on cross-examination, the officer denied having previously told defense counsel that "he had arrested the wrong man" and that "he had been threatened by a gang." Then appears the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.