1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 275 Wis.
  5. 275 Wis. 342 (1957)
 

BLOOMING GROVE v. MADISON

275 Wis. 342 (1957)

TOWN OF BLOOMING GROVE, Respondent, vs. CITY OF MADISON, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 5, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Harold E. Hanson, city attorney, Leon E. Isaksen, special counsel, attorneys, and Thomas, Orr, Isaksen & Werner and Trayton L. Lathrop, all of Madison of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Hanson, Mr. Leon E. Isaksen, and Mr. Lathrop.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Earl I. Cooper, attorney, and William J. P. Aberg and Paul C. Gartzke of counsel, all of Madison.

FAIRCHILD, J.

Appellant raises a number of objections to the right of the town to bring this action. They are the same objections which appellant raised in Blooming Grove v. Madison, ante, p. 328, 81 N.W.2d 713, and are disposed of adversely to appellant in that decision.

It has been frequently assumed that an annexation would be invalid if it caused the portion of a town not previously included within a village or city to be divided into two or more...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases