1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 315 P.2d
  5. 315 P.2d 265 (1957)
 

ATCHISON v. DIETRICH

No. 37542.

315 P.2d 265 (1957)

Myrtle Broadhurst ATCHISON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Edward C. DIETRICH, and A. Francis Porta, Ida M. Hall and Lois Miles, Trustees, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 9, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene O. Monnet, of Monnet, Monnet & Monnet, Tulsa, Rinehart & Rinehart, El Reno, for plaintiffs in error.

Fogg & Fogg, El Reno, for defendant in error, Edward C. Dietrich.

Porta & Weaver, El Reno, for defendants in error, A. Francis Porta, Ida M. Hall and Lois Miles, Trustees.

PER CURIAM.

This action was initiated by Edward C. Dietrich to secure judgment declaring that the class of persons named as remaindermen in the original deed of trust have no vested interest, and to secure judicial approval of an amendment of the trust changing the remaindermen, without the consent of the persons presently members of the class originally designated to be remaindermen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases