HOUSTON BELT & TERMINAL RAILWAY CO. v. BURMESTER

No. 13041.

309 S.W.2d 271 (1957)

HOUSTON BELT & TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Kurt BURMESTER, Appellee.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston.

Supplemental Opinion December 5, 1957.

Rehearings Denied January 30, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, and M. S. McCorquodale and Quentin Bates, Houston, for appellant Houston Belt and Terminal Ry. Co.

Chilton Bryan and E. H. Patton, Jr., Houston, for appellants James W. Maxcey, D. D. Danner and Danner's Marine Guard Service.

Eastham & Dale and Clarence S. Eastham, Houston, and Lockhart, Watson & Peterson, and Edward W. Watson, Galveston, for appellant Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S. A.

John L. Hill and W. James Kronzer, Houston, Hill, Brown, Kronzer & Abraham, Houston, of counsel, for appellee.


WOODRUFF, Justice.

This is a personal injury suit instituted by the appellee, Kurt Burmester, against the appellants, Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company, James W. Maxcey, D. D. Danner, and Danner's Marine Guard Service, a Partnership, in which Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S. A., intervened. As suggested by counsel, the appellants and intervenor, for the sake of brevity, will be referred to hereafter as Belt, Danner, and Intervenor.

Appellee, Kurt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases