Per Curiam.
The question presented is whether the plaintiff in each case is a "member of the family of the deceased" person she had married, within the meaning of that phrase as used in Section 4123.59, Revised Code.
There is no question in either case that plaintiff entered into a bigamous marriage with the now deceased employee, and there is no evidence of any consequence that a divorce was obtained either prior to or after the second marriage.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
