THRUSH v. THRUSH

No. 161.

97 S.E.2d 472 (1957)

246 N.C. 114

Anna B. THRUSH v. W. E. THRUSH.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 17, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. H. Ferguson and Aaron Goldberg, Wilmington, for defendant-appellant.

No counsel contra.


RODMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff is not here represented by counsel. No suggestion is made that the consent order signed by Judge Frizzelle puts at rest the validity of the attachment and the service of process.

Defendant asserts that the judgment is erroneous for that personal service of process was ineffective because by public policy he was exempt from such service, and the statute, G.S. § 1-440.7, is mandatory in its requirement that publication must begin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases