HARRITT v. LINFOOT, EXEC. ET AL


210 Or. 354 (1957)

311 P.2d 450

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JESSIE AALTJE HARRITT, DECEASED. HARRITT v. LINFOOT, EXECUTOR ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed May 15, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph P. Meier, of Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Samuel F. Speerstra, of Salem, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra, of Salem.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, BRAND and KESTER, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

BRAND, J.

In this contest Karl Wright Harritt, brother and sole heir at law, seeks to invalidate the will of Jessie Aaltje Harritt on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence alleged to have been exerted by Edith Bynon Low, with the assistance of Estella M. Bynon, beneficiaries under the will. Contestant appeals from a decree of the circuit court dismissing the contest, and admitting the will to probate in solemn form.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases