1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 245 F.2d
  5. 245 F.2d 302 (1957)
 

FRANKE v. WILTSCHEK

No. 257, Docket 24423.

245 F.2d 302 (1957)

August L. FRANKE and Marie V. Franke, doing business as Q. W. Laboratories, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William WILTSCHEK, Armand Blatt and William Wiltschek and Armand Blatt, doing business as W. B. Associates, doing business as Jo Lane Sales Company, and doing business as Facelettes Company (not incorporated), Defendants-Appellants, and Betti Pearson, Inc., Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided May 28, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving A. Thau, New York City, for defendants-appellants.

William D. Burrows, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before HINCKS, STEWART and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the propriety of a judgment of the district court against William Wiltschek and Armand Blatt individually for profits accruing from the manufacture and sale of compressed face-cloths in the form of hard cylinders, known as Facelettes, in an action where the two individuals and Betti Pearson, Inc. were found guilty of unfair competition. The amount of the profits is not in dispute.

The history of this case, which includes a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases