1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 355 U.S.
  5. 355 U.S. 175 (1957)
 

I. C. C. v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO.

No. 463.

355 U.S. 175 (1957)

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 9, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Ginnane and Isaac K. Hay for appellant in No. 463.

Guernsey Orcutt, Richard R. Bongartz and William Pepper Constable for appellant in No. 464.

Sidney Goldstein, Francis A. Mulhern, Arthur L. Winn, Jr., J. Stanley Payne and Samuel H. Moerman for appellants in No. 465.

Robert D. Brooks and Richard J. Murphy for appellant in No. 466.

John F. Donelan for appellants in No. 467.

Warren Price, Jr. for the Delaware River Port Authority, David Berger for the City of Philadelphia, and Frederick H. Knight for the Chamber of Commerce of Greater Philadelphia, appellants in No. 468.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States, appellant in No. 473.

Edwin H. Burgess, Anthony P. Donadio, Norman C. Melvin, Jr., William C. Purnell and Jervis Langdon, Jr. for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al., William L. Marbury for the Maryland Port Authority, Harry C. Ames and Charles McD. Gillan for the Baltimore Association of Commerce, Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. for the Canton Railroad Co. and Thomas N. Biddison for the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This litigation involves the validity of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission dealing with the proper relationship, under the National Transportation Policy (§ 1 of the Transportation Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 899, 49 U. S. C., at p. 7107), of railroad tariffs on imported iron ore shipped to a steel-producing area in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia (the so-called "differential territory" of the Central Freight Association) from the ports...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases