1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 275 Wis.
  5. 275 Wis. 255 (1957)
 

BIDDLE v. BIDDLE

275 Wis. 255 (1957)

BIDDLE, Respondent, vs. BIDDLE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 5, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Baumblatt & Goodman of Racine, and oral argument by L. P. Baumblatt.

For the respondent there was a brief by La France, Thompson, Greenquist, Zahn & Dye of Racine, and oral argument by Kenneth L. Greenquist.

BROADFOOT, J.

Sec. 247.37 (2), Stats., provides that the court shall have power to vacate or modify a judgment of divorce for sufficient cause shown at any time within one year from the granting of the judgment. In her petition the defendant alleged that she had reason to believe that the plaintiff had committed adultery after the entry of the judgment.

The findings and the record show that the plaintiff owned a lake...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases