CARDOSANTO v. CARDOSANTO


14 Misc.2d 498 (1957)

Concetta Cardosanto, Plaintiff, v. Lamberto Cardosanto et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

June 14, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. A. Penna & Tuckman for plaintiff.

L. M. Kooperstein for defendants.


GEORGE EILPERIN, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint in the within action upon the following grounds:

"1. That it appears on the face of the complaint that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. "2. That the marriage contracted by and between the defendant LAMBERTO CARDOSANTO and the defendant ESTELLE MIKALIUNAS CARDOSANTO is valid in accordance with the laws of the State of Connecticut where said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases