DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Petitioner,
v.
Lambert KING and Harry Bartz, t/a Bartz & King, a partnership, Respondents.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 11, 1957.
Decided March 28, 1957.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. George F. Donnella, Asst. Corporation Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corporation Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corporation Counsel, and Leo J. Ehrig, Jr., Asst. Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for petitioner. Messrs. Vernon E. West, Corporation Counsel at the time record was filed, and Henry E. Wixon, Asst. Corporation Counsel, also entered appearances for petitioner.
Mr. Edgar J. Goodrich, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Jerome J. Dick and George Herbert Goodrich, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondents.
Before WASHINGTON, BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
BURGER, Circuit Judge.
The District of Columbia asserted a deficiency assessment against appellees, retail jewelers, for the years 1953, 1954 and 1955 for failure to include in personal property tax returns1 about three-quarters of the merchandise in appellees' store. The Taxpayers included in their return one-quarter of their stock in trade which they owned absolutely, but did not include the other three-quarters made up of merchandise...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
