BRITISH TRANSPORT COMM'N v. U. S.

No. 247.

354 U.S. 129 (1957)

BRITISH TRANSPORT COMMISSION v. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 10, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean Acheson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Edwin Longcope and Charles A. Horsky.

Assistant Attorney General Doub argued the cause for the United States, respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Samuel D. Slade and William W. Ross.

Wilbur E. Dow, Jr. argued the cause for Haslam et al., respondents. With him on the brief were John W. Oast, Jr. and C. Lydon Harrell, Jr.


MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

The British Transport Commission, owner of the overnight ferry, Duke of York, questions the power of a District Court sitting in an admiralty limitation proceeding to permit the parties to cross-claim against each other for damages arising out of the same maritime collision. The United States, as owner of the U. S. N. S. Haiti Victory, had filed the original proceeding in which the Commission along...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases