IMPERIAL &c. CO. v. MODERNIZATION &c. CO.

36836.

96 Ga. App. 385 (1957)

100 S.E.2d 107

IMPERIAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, LTD., et al. v. MODERNIZATION CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided September 18, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James K. Rankin, Newell Edenfield, for plaintiffs in error.

John W. Wilcox, Jr., Wilson, Branch & Barwick, contra.


TOWNSEND, J.

1. Where it is contended in a special ground of a motion for new trial that an excerpt from the charge of the court is error as containing an expression of opinion on what has been proved, the excerpt will be considered in its context and with the charge as a whole, including a statement of the court that nothing he has said should be construed as an expression of opinion on his part. Hogg v. First...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases