FORD v. SUMMERFIELD

No. 13401.

243 F.2d 238 (1957)

Cornelius B. FORD, Appellant, v. Arthur E. SUMMERFIELD, Postmaster General, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided February 28, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur A. Birney, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Peyton Ford, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. E. Tillman Stirling, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., Lewis Carroll and William F. Becker, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.


DANAHER, Circuit Judge.

The District Court denied appellant's motion for, and granted summary judgment for the appellee. The plaintiff-appellant had claimed that as a rural mail carrier, he was entitled to certain benefits provided by the Seniority Act for Rural Mail Carriers,1 but that the Act had been erroneously construed by the Postmaster General. Appellant particularly asked the District Court to declare that a consolidation of four...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases