1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 214 Md.
  5. 214 Md. 251 (1957)
 

CLINE v. FOUNTAIN, ETC., COMPANY

[No. 225, October Term, 1956.]

214 Md. 251 (1957)

134 A.2d 304

CLINE v. FOUNTAIN ROCK LIME AND BRICK COMPANY, INC.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 26, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles McC. Mathias, Jr., and Stanford Hoff, with whom was Charles McC. Mathias on the brief, for appellant.

Edward D. Storm and Charles O. Fisher, for appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and COLLINS, HENDERSON, HAMMOND and PRESCOTT, JJ.

BRUNE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is the second appeal in this case. For the first appeal, see Cline v. Fountain Rock Lime and Brick Co., Inc., 210 Md. 78, 122 A.2d 449. The principal question presented on the present appeal is whether or not the amended or substituted declaration filed after the case was remanded constituted a new cause of action, which was barred by limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases