1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 3 A.D.2d
  5. 3 A.D.2d 436 (1957)
 

GEN. ELEC. CO. v. GOLDEN RULE APPLIANCE CO. INC.

3 A.D.2d 436 (1957)

General Electric Company, Respondent, v. Golden Rule Appliance Co., Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 23, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Burns of counsel (Raphael, Searles, Levin & Vischi, attorneys), for appellant.

William D. Conwell of counsel (White & Case, attorneys), for respondent.

BOTEIN, J. P., RABIN, FRANK, VALENTE and McNALLY, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

This court has repeatedly held that orders of reference upon the disposition of motions are not encouraged and should be made rarely and resorted to only in exceptional cases where the interests of justice require the unraveling of complicated facts which cannot be determined upon hopelessly conflicting affidavits. (Shillman v. Toulson, 211 App. Div. 336; Slutzkin v. Gerhard & Hey, 195 App. Div. 559; Weinberger v. Metropolitan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases