1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 2 Wis.2d
  5. 2 Wis.2d 410 (1957)
 

STATE v. HOCHMAN

2 Wis.2d 410 (1957)

STATE, Respondent, vs. HOCHMAN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 3, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Morton Gollin, attorney, and Herbert S. Bratt of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Gollin.

For the respondent there was a brief by the Attorney General and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, William J. McCauley, district attorney of Milwaukee county, and Hugh R. O'Connell, special assistant district attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Platz and Mr. O'Connell.

STEINLE, J.

There is sharp conflict as to material particulars in the evidence adduced by the state and that presented on behalf of the defendant. The weight and credibility of the evidence were for the court to determine. Of record there is evidence which the court was entitled to deem credible to the effect that the defendant owned and operated a retail novelty shop in Milwaukee; that Police Officer James Psarros, while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases