SCHASCHLO v. TAISHOFF


2 N.Y.2d 408 (1957)

Lydia Schaschlo, Respondent, v. Jerome Taishoff, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 8, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John McKim Minton and Rudolph Stand for appellant.

David P. Siegel for respondent.

CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., concur.


BURKE, J.

The question presented on this appeal pertains to a construction of the New York City Criminal Courts Act (art. V, § 61, subd. 4) relevant to the amount of support which may be decreed in filiation proceedings.

Section 69 of that act requires that, if paternity be established, "the court shall make an order of filiation * * * and shall order support".

Since no question is raised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases