1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 157 F.Supp.
  5. 157 F.Supp. 251 (1957)
 

WEBSTER ROSEWOOD CORP. v. SCHINE CHAIN THEATRES

Civ. A. No. 3679.

157 F.Supp. 251 (1957)

WEBSTER ROSEWOOD CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SCHINE CHAIN THEATRES, Inc., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. New York.

December 10, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gray, Anderson & Schaeffer, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff, Francis T. Anderson, Cormac J. Malloy, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel.

Raichle, Tucker & Moore, Buffalo, New York and Antevil & Antevil, Gloversville, New York, for defendants, James O. Moore, Jr., David C. Diefendorf, Buffalo, N. Y., Howard M. Antevil, Gloversville, N. Y., of counsel.

FOLEY, District Judge.

This action is one under the antitrust laws involving the usual provisions of the Sherman and Clayton Acts (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, 15, 16). It involves the motion picture business and by the complaint brings back on the screen the Schine interests, named as defendants, and the eight major distributors named as co-conspirators. Apparently, this type action will rise eternal against these same defense and conspirator players who featured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases