1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 211 Or.
  5. 211 Or. 188 (1957)
 

PETERKORT & CO. v. COUNTY ZONING DISTRICT

211 Or. 188 (1957)

313 P.2d 773

314 P.2d 912

PETERKORT & CO. ET AL v. EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY ZONING DISTRICT ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed July 3, 1957.

Petition for rehearing denied September 6, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice D. Sussman, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Alexander Schneider and Gilbert Sussman, Portland.

Carrell F. Bradley argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Bush & Bradley, Hillsboro.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, BRAND, WARNER and McALLISTER, Justices.

ON THE MERITS

AFFIRMED.

LUSK, J.

The plaintiffs, J. Peterkort & Co., an Oregon corporation; Bertha A. Peterkort and J. Peterkort, husband and wife, brought this suit against the East Washington County Zoning District, the commissioners of the district and certain county officials to obtain a decree declaring the zoning district to have been invalidly organized. All the plaintiffs are owners of real property and taxpayers in the district, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases