WINGAD v. WINGAD


2 Wis.2d 393 (1957)

WINGAD, Respondent, vs. WINGAD, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 3, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Darrell O. Hibbard and Frank E. Betz, both of Eau Claire.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by F. E. Yates of Eau Claire.


BROADFOOT, J.

The defendant first contends that the trial court's finding of cruel and inhuman treatment is not sustained by the evidence. The defendant argues that the only proof adduced by the plaintiff upon the trial was as to three or four trivial and unrelated incidents that neither separately nor collectively support the trial court's finding. The trial court in its memorandum decision said:

"Plaintiff's proof...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases