HANCE v. JOHNSON, STEPHENS & SHINKLE SHOE COMPANY

No. 7642.

306 S.W.2d 80 (1957)

Earnie HANCE, Employee, Appellant, v. JOHNSON, STEPHENS & SHINKLE SHOE COMPANY, Employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Insurer, Respondents.

Springfield Court of Appeals. Missouri.

October 23, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

White & White, Rolla, for appellant.

James E. Garstang, C. Lawrence Mueller, St. Louis, for respondents.


STONE, Judge.

In this proceeding for benefits under the Missouri Workmen's Compensation Law [Chapter 287], Earnie Hance, self-described as a "very goosy" individual, asserted that, while drinking at a fountain in the Rolla plant of Johnson, Stephens & Shinkle Shoe Company, his employer, "I was goosed and I jumped against the drinking fountain." (All statutory references herein are to RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S.) The referee in the first instance, and the Industrial Commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases