MEWHORTER v. INTEGRITY MUT. CASUALTY CO.


275 Wis. 77 (1957)

MEWHORTER, Administratrix, Plaintiff, vs. INTEGRITY MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY and another, Defendants. [Two appeals.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff there was a brief by O'Melia & Kaye of Rhinelander, and oral argument by John F. O'Melia.

For the defendants there were briefs by Emmet J. McCarthy of Marinette, and Stanley S. Chmiel of Appleton, and oral argument by Mr. McCarthy.


WINGERT, J.

We have reluctantly concluded that the instruction to the jury relative to Mewhorter's duty to maintain a lookout to the rear was erroneous, as held by the trial court in the January 6th decision, and that the error may well have been prejudicial to defendants. It follows that the court was right on January 6th in ordering a new trial, the subsequent order of January 19th offering options in lieu of a new trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases