PEDEK v. WEGEMANN


275 Wis. 57 (1957)

PEDEK, Respondent, vs. WEGEMANN and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Suel O. Arnold, James T. Murray, and Dougherty, Arnold & Philipp, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Arnold.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Alvin L. Zelonky of Milwaukee.


CURRIE, J.

The defendants first seek on this appeal to have the complaint dismissed on the ground that the two findings of causal negligence against Wegemann should be set aside, and, failing this, that it should be held that the negligence of Pedek is as a matter of law equal to, or greater than, the negligence of Wegemann. If these issues should be decided adversely to defendants' contentions, then a new trial is requested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases