SCHULTE v. PYLE

36503.

95 Ga. App. 229 (1957)

97 S.E.2d 558

SCHULTE et al. v. PYLE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided February 26, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander, Vann & Lilly, for plaintiffs in error.

Forester & Calhoun, contra.


FELTON, C. J.

1. The evidence was undisputed that the defendants Trulock owned the bottling business and that the defendant Schulte was their agent in charge of its operation. Schulte's duties were that of executive and administrative head of the bottling company and he did the hiring and firing in connection therewith. The negligence of an under-servant in respect to the inspection of bottles and the soft drink was not attributable to the defendant Schulte. Code...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases