1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 2 Wis.2d
  5. 2 Wis.2d 321 (1957)
 

RUSCH v. KORTH

2 Wis.2d 321 (1957)

RUSCH, Plaintiff, vs. KORTH and another, Defendants and Appellants: HEIMERL and another, Impleaded Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 3, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Thiel, Allen & Storck of Mayville, and oral argument by Robert E. Storck.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by George A. Hartman, Jr., of Juneau.

WINGERT, J.

1. The judgment appealed from is undoubtedly based upon the trial court's view, shared by the parties, that if Mrs. Korth was not herself causally negligent with respect to the accident, she could not have contribution with respect to the amount she paid to the plaintiff to settle his claim. It was no doubt because of this conception of the law, that the record presents the rather unusual spectacle of Korth urging the court to change the jury's answers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases